2014-09-09 18:45 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:28:55PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: >> Hi George, >> >> Why dma_controller_create can not be set in struct musb_platform_ops? >> Then each module would be able to set dma_controller_create it wants, >> and musb_init_controller would use musb->ops->dma_controller_create >> instead of just dma_controller_create. > > patches are welcome :-) >
Will the following approach be acceptable? 1. musbhsdma.o cppi_dma.o tusb6010_omap.o ux500_dma.o musb_cppi41.o became independent modules (tristate), each module exports two symbols: PREFIX_dma_controller_create and ..._destroy. 2. add two callbacks to musb_platform_ops, when pointers are NULL then no DMA is used 3. every module uses appropriate &PREFIX_dma_controller_create in its PREFIX_ops structure 4. musb_core uses wrappers which calls musb->ops->dma_controller_create and destroy In this case every DMA mode can be reused more by several drivers if necessarily. -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov http://blog.matwey.name xmpp://0x2...@jabber.ru -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
