Hello,
Johan Hovold 於 2015/3/16 下午 04:55 寫道:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:08:29AM +0800, Peter Hung wrote:
Could you rewrite this as
if (status < 0)
status = usb_translate_errors(status);
else
status = 0;
In my definition the return value of set/getregister(), 0 is success,
negative values are errors. The function usb_control_msg() return value
is success transmited/received byte. It's maybe return 0. I want to
treat 0 with error(-EIO). But if pass 0 to usb_translate_errors(), It
will return 0 back. So I need especially handle with status == 0.
I meant to write
if (status < 0)
status = usb_translate_errors(status);
else
status = -EIO;
which I think is more readable.
It's looks more readable of the style that you mentioned.
Thanks for your advice, I'll add it with next patch.
--
With Best Regards,
Peter Hung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
