I figure that someone had a large roll of red tape there and had trouble finding the 
end ;-)

jeremyb.
 
> From: Johnno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/04/29 Mon PM 12:22:48 GMT+12:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Domainz
> 
> I have the same problem..   and the hassle i had to fo throw to change the
> holder name was a real pain..  I first tried to goto the name holder details
> and change them there and it come up to say i was not allowed to..
> 
> Then why do they have that option there if it does not work....
> 
> I ened up filling in the paper work and sending it off...
> 
> Johnno
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremy Bertenshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:38 AM
> Subject: OT: Domainz
> 
> 
> > I haven't had a rant in a while so here we go...
> >
> > What is domainz's problem? they appear to be trying to complicate the
> whole domain registration change process with beaurocratic nonsense...
> >
> > A part of our business was sold and we wanted to transfer a domain to the
> purchaser... easy you would think... I filled in all the forms, got the
> purchaser (In Australia) to fax their part to me as for legal reasons we
> were in a tad of a hurry.. mistake number 1.
> >
> > I put down our company details with our name blahblah New Zealand Limited
> and posted it off.. mistake number 2.
> >
> > Unfortunately (but fortunately for them) I was on leave when they rang and
> they talked to my boss, it seems that not only is the faxed part of the
> letter is inadmissable, but because the domain was registered as blahblah
> new zealand (sans limited) we needed to fill out another form and send it
> back...
> >
> > Now is it just me or is that completely petty, I can vaguely understand
> the fax thing (ooooh i might have forged their details...) but the whole
> 'limited' thing, really!...
> >
> > Apparently there is some new rule about domains only being registered as
> an individual or as company name (written exactly as per your company
> registration documents) in the same way as they do Australia. Fair enough
> you would think, however when asked if this will affect other domains which
> were registered years ago without the 'limited' bit, they said it would
> cause problems but they're not going to do anything about advising people of
> all the changes...
> >
> > Normal programming shall now resume.
> >
> > jeremyb.
> >
> >
> 
> 


Reply via email to