You are correct, I'll change it. I was intending for ie to denote more of a "for example" rather than the more literal Latin meaning of "that is" but I can see how confusion could occur. Thanks for the input...
Yuri de Groot wrote: >>P.S. I attach a document in RTF format for you. RTF format can be >>viewed in any wordprocessor, i.e. Microsoft Word. >> >>This serves two purposes, educates people who have never heard of rtf >>and also downgrades WORD to the simple wordprocessor it actually is. > > > Actually, this reinforces MS Word as the *only* word processor. > To convey the intended meaning, change "i.e." to "e.g." > > I know it's semantics, but in this case perhaps an important distinction? >
