Nup - it was OBVIOUSLY a giant play-on-words relating to IEtheonetruewebbrowser....
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You are correct, I'll change it. I was intending for ie to denote more > of a "for example" rather than the more literal Latin meaning of "that > is" but I can see how confusion could occur. Thanks for the input... > > Yuri de Groot wrote: > >>P.S. I attach a document in RTF format for you. RTF format can be > >>viewed in any wordprocessor, i.e. Microsoft Word. > >> > >>This serves two purposes, educates people who have never heard of rtf > >>and also downgrades WORD to the simple wordprocessor it actually is. > > > > > > Actually, this reinforces MS Word as the *only* word processor. > > To convey the intended meaning, change "i.e." to "e.g." > > > > I know it's semantics, but in this case perhaps an important distinction? > >
