Hi Bill,
        try adding a localdomain name the hostname in /etc/hosts. A name
like 'localnet.net' will do.

The "redhat7.0" hostname is not required for the localhost which is for
internel pinging to host 'localhost' only.

eg /etc/hosts

127.0.0.1         localhost.localdomain  localhost
192.168.1.1       pentium.localnet.net   pentium
192.168.1.2       duron.localnet.net     duron


Have a look at man #ifconfig and #route.
Type #route in console to check it is up and the commands are like
this.

#ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
#route  add -host 192.168.1.2 eth0


cheers,
Keith.


>    /etc/hosts
>            192.168.1.2       duron       duron
>            127.0.0.1            redhat7.0   redhat7   localhost.localdomain
> localhost
>            192.168.1.1        pentium    pentium



On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bill Evans wrote:

> I am aiming to set up a SAMBA network between two computers.
> They are a Duron 800 with 128 MB RAM running Windows98 (1st edition)
> and a Pentium 133 with 32MB RAM running Redhat 7.0.
>
> As a first step I am trying to establish an ethernet connection between the
> two.
> Previously when the Pentium was running Windows98 I had successfully
> networked the two together.
> The NICs and cable have not been altered since then (apart from checking the
> cable connection just now.)
>
> I cannot ping between the two computers.
> Both computers can ping their own local host.
> The Pentium, running Linux, can ping itself at the address 192.168.1.1.
> (using either the address or nickname)
> Perhaps significantly, the Duron, running Windows, cannot ping itself
> (192.168.1.2)
>
> On the Duron:
>     Network configuration shows:
>         Primary Network Logon is set to Client for Microsoft Networks
>         File and printer sharing for MS Networks is installed
>         The NIC is listed as  PLANET ENW-9503/04 PCI Fast Ethernet NIC
>         Both NetBEUI and TCP/IP are installed for this card.
>         TCP/IP properties:
>             IP Address  192.168.1.2
>             Mask           255.255.255.0
>
>      I have edited  the c:\windows\hosts   file  to contain the following:
>             127.0.0.1      localhost
>             192.168.1.1   pentium
>             192.168.1.2   duron
>
>
> On the Pentium:
> I have looked around for files I thought might be relevant.
> Here they are:  Don't ask where I configured each of these.  I have been
> playing around in both the CLI and in Gnome's
> Network Configuration for the last couple of days :)
>
>     the NIC, the subject of an earlier thread, is now recognised ok
>    /etc/modules.conf
>         alias  eth0  ne2-pci
>         alias  parport_lowlevel parport_pc
>
>    /etc/HOSTNAME
>         pentium
>   /etc/hosts.conf
>         order   hosts,bind
>
>
>    (Initially either the localhost or pentium, I forget which,  was called
> wb.invalid by default, but I changed it.  Given the following DOMAINNAME,
> this might be significant.)
>
>     /etc/sysconfig/network
>         NETWORKING=yes
>        HOSTNAME=pentium
>        DOMAINNAME=invalid
>        GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>        GATEWAYDEV=eth0
>
>    /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
>        DEVICE=eth0:0
>        BOOTPROTO=none
>
>    /etc/resolv.conf
>       nameserver  192.168.1.1
>
>    /etc/networks
>         this file is empty
>
> Network Configuration.
>    Gnome's Network Configuration shows settings as follows:
>          Hostname,  nameserver, hosts, default gateway, and default gateway
> device all as above.
>
>    Interfaces:
>         Interface lo
>         IP            127.0.0.1
>         Proto      none
>         atboot     yes
>         active      active
>
>         Interface eth0
>         IP            192.168.1.1
>         Proto      static
>         atboot     yes
>         active      active
>
>         Interface eth0:0
>         IP
>         Proto      none
>         atboot
>         active      active
>
>    Interface eth0:0 is a mystery to me . Does this get set automatically?
>
>    Any help would be appreciated.
>    I would guess the problem lies in the Windows machine, given that it
> cannot ping itself.
>
>     Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to