We use sarg to do exactly what Theuns is saying here at work. Altho no one around here seems to really care.
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:18 PM Subject: RE: Network censorship (was: Re: Network integration: was SAMBA i nstallation query) > sarg is good for this - churns the access logs and creates top-user lists > too. > > > ---------- > > From: Theuns Verwoerd > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 4 September 2002 13:01 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Network censorship (was: Re: Network integration: was SAMBA > > installation query) > > > > Greetings > > > > One solution mentioned for use with office networks: > > Maintain a list of where each user browses to. Make it publicly visible - > > > > while the dodgy pages would still be accessible, users are responsible for > > > > their actions (and any fallout that results). > > > > [In other words, grab a dump of the cache logs and put it online, > > basically] > > > > Basically a form of responsive social censorship. [And it may teach more > > than a technical solution, but that's just my opinion] > > > > Theuns > > KRN > > > > > I personally think that these things are a waste of time and money. > > > They might be able to filter much of the nasties but they also tend > > > to catch good stuff like if the child is researching breast or genital > > > cancer or looking at anything from the town of Scunthorpe in England. > > There > > > was even some suggestion a few years ago that one of these filters had > > > filtered out one of the major political party's web sites but not the > > > other. > > > > > > I think that children should not be allowed to go on the net without > > > supervision would you let you child walk down the main street of Chch > > > alone? > > > > > > Putting too much faith in them is dangerous and they also tend to limit > > the > > > quality of the web experience. > > > > > > My 2cents > > > > > > Regards , > > > Zane > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:09:08 +1200 > > > Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > It searches for naughty words in a web page and attempts to block > > > > > appropriately. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can also put in blocking lists of naughty URL's. > > > > > > > > On a related note, Radio NZ has an automated email system for recipes > > > > (email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this weeks Kim Hill recipe is > > > > returned. ) Apparently last week's recipe fell foul of a few mail > > filter > > > > programmes (e.g Mail Marshall). The recipe? cockaleekie soup LOL -- > > Nick > > > > Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Theuns Verwoerd 27 Nazareth Avenue > > Software Engineer PO Box 8011 > > Allied Telesyn Research Christchurch > > phone +64 3 339 3000 New Zealand > > fax +64 3 339 3002 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > web: http://www.alliedtelesyn.co.nz/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >
