On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 12:25, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > now-a-days the only real reason for learning vi(m) is that it > is virtually always installed on any and all Unix machines. I agree with Chris, any system that does not have vi would be a highly tied-down firewall or so old as to be up for replacement. There are many machines out there which only have vi, however. Learn a *bit* of vi. You don't have to be a wiz, but you should be able to do the basic editing tasks. I know enough vi to get XEmacs installed on a Debian box that has only the "base" packages installed :) -- Michael JasonSmith http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpj17/
- Re: LAN Firewalling Ben Devine
- Re: LAN Firewalling Justin Soong
- Re: LAN Firewalling Ben Devine
- Re: LAN Firewalling Paul
- Re: LAN Firewalling Christopher Sawtell
- Re: LAN Firewalling Justin Soong
- Re: Re: LAN Firewalling Jeremy Bertenshaw
- Re: Re: LAN Firewalling Justin Soong
- Re: Re: LAN Firewalling Christopher Sawtell
- Re: LAN Firewalling Nick Rout
- Re: LAN Firewalling Michael JasonSmith
- Re: LAN Firewalling Nick Rout
- Re: LAN Firewalling Michael JasonSmith
- LAN Firewalling: Jeremy Brentenshaws ... Justin Soong
- Re: LAN Firewalling: Jeremy Bren... Christopher Sawtell
- Re: LAN Firewalling: Jeremy ... Nick Rout
- Re: LAN Firewalling: Jeremy Bren... Nick Rout
