On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 09:22, Carl Cerecke wrote: > I doubt they looked at Linux very objectively. > > In a way, they were right though. It *would* be more expensive > for *them* because they don't have expertise in Linux. Somebody > else could do it cheaper I'm sure.
Why sell them a system that will last for ever and be maintainable by the user when you can sell them a new proprietary system every time Microsoft changes their operating system? Vik :v)
