On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:39:20PM +1200, Ben Aitchison wrote:
> Well, you have to update for security issues. And often there are
> dependicies that decide they want to be updated too. I much prefer
> just having upgrades every 6 months.
If you update something that other packages depends on, you need to
rebuild the dependant packages, or install the binaries of them anyway.
So nothing is different there.
Where is this 'constantly changing' system?
Six month upgrade cycles don't include fixes for security or
correctness. You have to keep up-to-date with them as anybody else
does--as the fixes become available.
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
/| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
