On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:36, you wrote:
> then again there are people who are coming along merely to lend their
> boxes for a compile farm - should they pay $20? They may just not turn
> up, which would be a bit of a pain.

Indeed, I forgot about them.
The problem is to set up something fair for all concerned, the OSTC 
particularly, as it is on the point of collapse financially.

> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003
>
> 11:23:39+1200 Christopher Sawtell<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:12, you wrote:
> > > yes i move that all participants - installers and installees pay a
> > > fixed fee each ($5?? $10??) for the privilege.
> > >
> > > Its much easier to make a flat fee for all concerned.
> > >
> > > And David deserves the support.
> >
> > The normal charges from the OSTC are $10 per person, per evening, or
> > $25 per month, as many visits as you want.
> >
> > My own feeling it that we will probably be wanting to use the
> > facilities more intensively than one would for the normal 3 hour
> > 'evening session'.
> >
> > Perhaps it could be argued that a $20 fee would not be out of order,
> >  ( $10 for card carrying members of the under-class ) and for an extra
> >  $5
> > you'd get the free use of the OSTC facilities for the rest of the
> > month.
> >
> > David: You might like to comment?
> >
> > > We need somewhere for all day, perhaps overnight & come back in the
> > > morning. Nowhere else suggested has this sort of facility with
> > > broadband connection.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2003
> > >
> > > 20:35:01+1200 Christopher Sawtell<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Yes, that's correct at the moment, I'm not sure about the venue.
> > > > There are several flights of stairs up to the OSTC room & no lift.
> > > > Also if we end up with many more than about dozen or so punters
> > > > who want installs done it will be somewhat, like very, cramped.
> > > > The other point about the OSTC is that David Kirk, quite
> > > > reasonably, will want to charge us for the use of the facilities.
> >
> > --
> > C. S.

-- 
--
C. S.

Reply via email to