> Hi Guy, > > If the goods supplied as a copy of an original brand RHXX (TM) > is the same as the content of their own public release they > have no grounds to > object. > > As long as the trademark is acknowleged ie BrandName (TM). OK, so (leaving aside questions as to why I would want to, public health issues etc) I would be quite entitled to set up a stall in front of a McDonalds outlet selling McDonalds burgers?
> If the content is different this would need to be > acknowledged/stated by the > distributor/seller. > > Product authenticity can also be maintained by their own > Boxed product retail > releases? > > If a product purported to be the same as RHXX (TM) public distribution > is proven to differ without an acknowledgement of this > difference by the > distributor/seller then they would have a case (which they > must prove). > > > > As any one in business knows the more exposure your product > > > recieves the better for your business: > > > If as a business you seek to limit that brand exposure you would > > > only do this to maintain or increase profits: > > > > The problems is, Redhat have absolutely no control over > what it is that is > > getting exposure under their brand name. > > > > Guy Steven > > Regards > Michael >
