On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:49:03PM NZST, CF wrote:
:On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 09:59, Carl Cerecke wrote:
:
:> If a bunch of us joined together, it would be fairly cheap, no? Is it a 
:> wise use of CLUG funds to set something like this up and charge, say, 
:> $1/month ? (We're not exactly scraping the bottom of the barrel ATM).
:
:Reasonable - it would be an excellent MTA-learning opportunity for
:someone.  The questions that come straight to mind are:
:       what response time would you expect from the mail server?
:       same question for bandwidth to the mail server.
:       Privacy of your email - do you trust the mailserver?
:       Shell accounts?
:Anything else?
:
:Users would be wanting pop3 / imap / webmail access to their mail, and
:what else?

procmail, or whatever sorting/filtering/mangling people prefer.  This
would be especially handy for dialup users.  It could mean saving a fair
bit of download time, I'd imagine.

What I would look for is SSL enabled imap for message retreival and to
be able to shuttle messages through smtp, which can also be wrapped with
SSL.  Webmail would be handy at times, too.

GPG becomes a problem with webmail, however.  It forces you to put trust
into the webserver.  I would be hesitant to go that way.  I just
wouldn't sign/encrypt anything over webmail.  However, with the
imap/smtp options, all secure processing can be done at a controlled
endpoint.

Random thoughts.  Kinda uncollected at this point.

Greg
--- -

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to