On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 01:47, Nick Rout wrote:
> yeah good idea, cos next we will be on about the programmers at
> canterbury, at least one of whom is on this list (refer page A5 of
> today's paper)
> 
> :-)
Hurrumph!
 Chaos my eye!

You just wait till the week before lectures *then* there'll be chaos.
(just kidding... gawd I hope just kidding :-/    )

That was a stupid quote from that student who said that departments
weren't talking to each other. 

It was a bug in our software not lack of interdepartmental 
communication.  New software *always* has bugs.


> 
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:26:15 +1300
> Mike Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:17:58PM +1300, Matthew Gregan wrote:
> > > As fascinating as bagging CPIT might be to you, it doesn't have a great
> > > deal to do with Linux.
> > 
> > Indeed, and as a Tertiary Institution IT professional myself, it's rather on
> > the nose that you bag them without knowing what the real story on the inside
> > is.
> > 
> > Lets let this thread die, shall we?
> > 
> > Mike.
> > -- 
> > Mike Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                      ZL4TXK, IRLP Node 6184
> > 
> >                  Contentsofsignaturemaysettleduringshipping.
> > 
-- 
Zane Gilmore, Analyst / Programmer
Information Services Section, Information Technology Dept, 
University of Canterbury - Te Whare Waananga o Waitaha
Private Bag 4800, 
Christchurch New Zealand  Phone +64-3-364 2987 extn 7895

Reply via email to