The permissions on a directory mounted as vfat are normally rwxrwxrwx
and this will follow for most of the subdirectories/files. A dos/win
directory entry does not hold linux type permissions, only the dos rash
attributes. The w may not apply to some windows system files and I know
from testing that linux will set the a attribute if it has been cleared
under dos/win.

In a terminal 'mount' (ret) will tell you whether the ptn is mounted,
make sure it is rw, not ro. 'mount /c' or 'mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /c'
should mount it

HTH
Barry
----------------------
Col wrote:
> 
> That should have worked. Did you umount the partition, edit /etc/fstab,
> and then mount
> the partition again? Or dare I susgest a reboot so the changes in fstab
> take effect on
> startup.
> 
> Col.
> 
> >hi, yes i tryed that but it still doesn't allow me to read or write to fat32.
> >i think i still need to rebuild my kernal, compile it, then install it.  it's
> >the install part which i'm unsure about....
> >
> >cheers, sam
> >
> >
> >
> >>Did you pay particular attention to this particular part?
> >>/dev/hda1   /mnt/c   vfat   defaults,umask=000    0 0
> >>
> >>The umask=000 should let the world read/write/execute
> >>HTH.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
> >>On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:01, stm23 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>hi, i successfully mounted my fat32 partition & altered my
> >>>/etc/fstab file.
> >>>
> >>>now i can access the partition, however i can't modify the
> >>>permissions & therefore can't read or write to the partition. i
> >>>tried to follow the instructions provided in this link, from
> >>>robert:
> >>>(http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=29285)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Did you pay particular attention to this particular part?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>/dev/hda1   /mnt/c   vfat   defaults,umask=000    0 0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The umask=000 should let the world read/write/execute
> >>
> >>HTH.
> >>
> >>hads
> >>--
> >>We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids?
> >>              -- I. I. Rabi to the Atomic Energy Commission
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to