The huge time consumption will be due complex reading/rewriting/deleting from one part of the disk to another, across the new partition line.

Much quicker (& safer, no doubt) is to truncate the XP partition beyond all of its stored data (NB including "unmoveable" files, as XP can describe after defragmentation), & avoid all that. I.e. leave XP enough space to function properly - I believe it has a minimum partition requirement to work (incl. swap).

On my laptop's 40GB hdd, this was around the 10/12GB mark - YMMV.

Christopher Sawtell wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:21, Christopher Sawtell wrote:


This operation took 3 hours to complete.


This is obviously unacceptable!
Have you _any_ idea why?



More thoughts. (I know Our Emily disapproves of following up to ones own postings)

a) Antique, slow disc?
what do:-
hdparm -T /dev/hdX have to say.  X := actual letter
hdparm -t  /dev/hdX have to say.  X := actual letter
have to say?

b) DMA on? hdparm -d /dev/hdX have to say. X := actual letter

You can turn it on with:-
hdparm -d1  /dev/hdX have to say.  X := actual letter

for those willing and able 'man hdparm' is actually a pretty good manual page.


--
InfoHelp Services  http://www.infohelp.co.nz/linux.html  i686 2.4.20-8
RedHat Linux 9.0 - Gnome 2.2.0 - OpenOffice 1.0.2 - Mozilla Mail 1.2.1




Reply via email to