Well I dont see how distros patching uname to display such proves
anything .......SCO group is pretty much a ship with too smaller bailing
buckets ....
InfoHelp wrote:
Edit, less haste:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:04:51 +1200, InfoHelp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:40:20 +1200, Dale Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Being that uname can and has been patched , has been broken in more
ways than one in its existance and currently still requires patches
in latest coreutils to return the expected output ...I dont quite
see how this provides "closure" (tm) .......nor is it really
worthwhile.
Dale.
Is it or is it not a statement by the Distro team of what type
"Operating System" they are distributing?
Is a "closure" (tm) that helps get SCO off our backs in the
marketplace not "really worthwhile"?
Rik
--
GNU/Linux Users - charting the course - prototype7:
Fedora/SuSE/Mandrake-Slackware/Gentoo/LFS-(Perl/Linux)-Debian/BSD-
GNU/Hurd
