On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:01:38 +1200 Chris Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there, > > Steve Bell wrote: > >>What's missing in gimp? > > A few things. Photoshop might also be seen to be missing a few things > too. > > The biggest thing missing about Gimp is a well researched and objective > review, as opposed to subjective spin from people who have spent a mere > fraction of the time a digital artist would need to spend to acquaint > themselves with either software... > > > If any of you have seen "The Castle", I would have to say it's "just the > > whole vibe of it". It's the feel. A better lawyer than me has written a > > review which I pretty-much agree with here: > > http://tingilinde.typepad.com/starstuff/2004/05/gimp_vs_photosh.html > > The skill of law practice is partly based upon focusing attention > upon the best and/or worst things about a given topic/case... > > Based on that is a lawyer the best person to give a fair review of > a software like Gimp? Then again wtf do I know?....I'm only a lowly > factory worker... I am not sure where the idea came from that the reviewer was a lawyer. http://tingilinde.typepad.com/about.html "I have a particle physics background and live happily with my wife Sukie and our four ferrets" maybe it was the ferret reference. nick (lawyer and part time gimp user) > > -- > Kind regards, > > Chris Wilkinson, Christchurch, New Zealand. > Canterbury Horse Taxis. http://www.horsetaxis.co.nz/ > -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
