Hi there,
Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:01:38 +1200 Chris Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
Steve Bell wrote:
What's missing in gimp?
A few things. Photoshop might also be seen to be missing a few things too.
The biggest thing missing about Gimp is a well researched and objective review, as opposed to subjective spin from people who have spent a mere fraction of the time a digital artist would need to spend to acquaint themselves with either software...
If any of you have seen "The Castle", I would have to say it's "just the whole vibe of it". It's the feel. A better lawyer than me has written a review which I pretty-much agree with here: http://tingilinde.typepad.com/starstuff/2004/05/gimp_vs_photosh.html
This is the bit I read...
The skill of law practice is partly based upon focusing attention upon the best and/or worst things about a given topic/case...
Based on that is a lawyer the best person to give a fair review of a software like Gimp? Then again wtf do I know?....I'm only a lowly factory worker...
I am not sure where the idea came from that the reviewer was a lawyer.
"A better lawyer than me has written a review which I pretty-much agree with here:"
...quoted from above...I rattled my reply hastily, but wouldn't you agree a graphics oriented person who has lived and breathed Gimp and Photoshop, and can get the best from both would do a better job than someone with ferrets in their trouser?
maybe it was the ferret reference.
Was his nickname Compo?... :-)
-- Kind regards,
Chris Wilkinson, Christchurch, New Zealand. Canterbury Horse Taxis. http://www.horsetaxis.co.nz/
