On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 10:00, Carl Cerecke wrote: > There's the problem: high compression. You only get high compression on > highly uniform data. Forget most jpeg/mpeg/mp3/rpm/tar.gz files. That > is, most of the larger stuff already has some sort of compression > applied to it. It's not going to get much smaller (may even get bigger!) > with extra compression. And you also have to remember that a lot (if not most) Web pages are compressed (with GZip) before they are sent across the Ether, so they get added to the list :) -- Michael JasonSmith http://www.ldots.org/
- Re: Freakin' chipmunks! Vik Olliver
- OT: have any of yall heard of this? Steve Bell
- RE: Freakin' chipmunks! Steve Bell
- Sort myself out boy Steve Bell
- Re: Sort myself out boy Nick Rout
- Flames, Was:: Re: Sort myself out boy Derek Smithies
- Re: Sort myself out boy Sascha Beaumont
- compression (was Re: Freakin' chipmunks!) Carl Cerecke
- Re: compression (was Re: Freakin' chipmunks!) Nick Rout
- Re: compression (was Re: Freakin' chipmunks!) Carl Cerecke
- Re: compression (was Re: Freakin' chipmunks!) Michael JasonSmith
- Re: compression (was Re: Freakin' chipmunks!) Sascha Beaumont
- RE: Freakin' chipmunks! C. Falconer
- Re: Freakin' chipmunks! Christopher Sawtell
- Re: Freakin' chipmunks! Sascha Beaumont
- Re: Freakin' chipmunks! Vik Olliver
- Re: Freakin' chipmunks! Nick Rout
