On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:51:20PM +1300, Robert Himmelmann wrote:
> For many people that might be good, but if we follow this we would
> probably end up with something like a mac.
why would that be a bad thing?
> The strong side of GNU/Linux is that it is fully configurable and that
> those people who know what they are doing can get the most out of
> their boxes. The best would be something that combines simplicity and
> flexibility.
how does mac OS X not offer that?
if you have used mac os x i am curious to see some examples of where you
feel the flexibility is lost, and how GNU/Linux would improve there?
the only problem i see with mac os x is that the gui stuff is not free.
but GNUstep is catching up, and eventually we will ahve a gui that
rivals that of mac os x and leaves kde and gnome in the dust.
greetings, martin.
--
offering experience: sTeam, caudium, pike, roxen and unix sysadmin
doing: programming, training and administration. anywhere in the world
--
pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org
unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at
administrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.schon.org
Martin B�hr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
