I took some flak when the "disclaimer" was first applied. We haven't discussed the philosophy or legal standing of such disclaimers beyond Chris's little, um, enthuse last week.

Robert Himmelmann wrote:
This must have been before I came here. Where about in the archives can I find this conversation?

I heartily agree. But we've covered this before, ad nauseum. Thanks for the painful reminder.

======================================================================= This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or lost by reason of this transmission. If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no other act on the email. Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been altered or corrupted during transmission. =======================================================================



Reply via email to