> I've had to use {x=(y==0):1:0;} instead. I've seen worse.
Yep. Isn't this gcc?> Yup. I adopt a simpler solution - order more capable PIC samples :) Always a realistic option. At least it's only PIC assembler, and not Intel x86, which is rather more, uhhhm, let's say, convoluted. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
