On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:37, mpj17 wrote: > >===== Original Message From [email protected] ===== > > > >>===== Original Message From [email protected] ===== > >> > >> steps a) and b) used the same library. So it is not an increase in > >> the library size. The crucial thing was that the compiler was > >> significantly change soas to require more ram to compile the test > >> library. > > > > * Use -Os, and > > * Make sure -g is not being used. > > My bad, you are talking about the RAM used to compile the library. Neh, > there is nothing you can do about that except wait for the next > release and hope for the best :) Add more RAM, it's cheap enough these days, or add more swap space, which can be a file, and let it do its thing in its own time.
-- CS
