On Mon 05 Dec 2005 13:39:24 NZDT +1300, Jim Cheetham wrote: [GPL-v3]
Maybe, but that's not out yet, and it wouldn't effect any software already released with the standard wording "... at your option, GPL v2 or later". Where to draw the line might be open for debate, but IMHO in the case of apache serving content it's pretty clear, and as far as I am concerned, a CMS is identical to a web server. > > > of their changes, and the GPL does not require it's release. Am I right? > > > > Yes. The need to supply the source of any changes only kicks in when > > distributing changed binary. "In-house" is not distributed. > > Hang on - was that "yes, they must release changes" or "yes, Nick seems > to be correct"? I answered Nick's question ;) I.e. "Yes, he's right." Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
