... or html, although you'd have to fake the columns. Gives you a bit of a freer hand with fonts and the like if I understand it right.
Steve On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:24:18 +1300 Carl Cerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another option is to have your script automatically generate an OOo > opendocument format file. Something like PyOpenOffice might be > sufficient. > > But I'd still do it in LaTeX. > > Cheers, > Carl. > > On 14/12/05, Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:56, Nick Rout wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:49:12 +1300 > > > > > > Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > > > > well why is a word processor so difficult? I know the issues with > > > > > them, but setting up a two column document and then cutting and > > > > > pasting should do the trick - whether or not it is the solution will > > > > > depend on other things, but it will work. > > > > > > > > Doubtless it would, but not for 31,000 'clauses'! > > > > > > why not? > > Cutting and pasting some 31,000 clauses in some glorious GUI of a word > > processor. Well, I'm nearly 63 now, and I honestly don't think I have got > > enough time before the Grim Reaper pushes me off this mortal coil. Anyways > > you know what food processors do to your tucker? Well I'm somewhat anxious > > that the words avoid a similar fate. > > > > Initial fiddling as suggested by Volker suggest that LaTeX is the way to > > go. Many thanks V. > > > > -- > > CS > > >
