On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:14, you wrote: > Your are correct, > > It is an issue that the site is largely flash based, and there is no > excuse for the new 'non flash' site taking a year to do > > But I'm confused about the comment below with the 'noflash.html' > page, there is not one embed tag, (but a link to view the non-flash > site -- which sucks, yes -- and a link to download flash), what gave > you the impression that it *REQUIRES* flash?
Um, I don't have Flash, so when I go to www.e2-media.co.nz I end up here: http://www.e2-media.co.nz/noflash.html ...and just beneath your logo it says "UPGRADE FLASH PLAYER (version 6+ required) this site requires the free flash plugin" So, where it says "this site requires the free flash plugin" is where I got the impression from. A -- Now playing: Marilyn Manson - Tourniquet
