The one thing I don't really like is the way Arch treats the kernel... it's pretty non standard and makes it difficult to install new drivers/modules etc... But I think it's a small price to pay for all of the other good points!
Arch is definitely the distro I would recommend to anyone with slightly older hardware! I might have to stick it on my work laptop in vmware so I can have a play! :) Ben -----Original Message----- From: Hadley Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 8 September 2006 10:01 a.m. To: [email protected] Subject: Arch Linux (was Re: Upstart - Ubuntu's new init) On Friday 08 September 2006 09:10, Ben Ford wrote: > Have you tried it lately? > > I installed it recently onto one of my laptops and it seems much improved > since last time I looked. I went from Arch to Kubuntu on my main laptop for > exactly the reasons you just mentioned, (and the fact that it's a tablet > and I couldn't get the wacom stuff going for love nor money) but I'm > seriously considering switching back and giving the modular xorg a go! > > I'd also say I find it easier to keep it up to date than deb based systems > too. The pacman package manager is quite nice, I agree. You prompted me to have another look at it so I just rebooted into it and it didn't recognise my NIC (r1000) - I have just upgraded my box this week so it is different to last time I booted it up. No problem I thought, I'll just chroot into the installation and run an update (pacman -Syu) to get a new kernel which should have support for the NIC. It needed 950MB of updates and all the mirrors were slow as a wet week from here - 2KB/s slow. It'll have to be another time then I guess. hads -- http://nicegear.co.nz New Zealand's VoIP supplier
