Top post - no apology. If you do not like Carl's "solution" then there is no shame in being bold enough not to be silent.
I will be the first..... Some of Rik's (not just recent) posts make no sense to me and I wish he would stop being paranoiac about various subjects. Rob (And yes it has taken a while to pluck up the courage to say exactly what I mean but Rik, you have driven me to it) On Wednesday 29 November 2006 3:59 pm, Carl Cerecke wrote: > On 29/11/06, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Consensus is unavailable to us here, so spare yourself > > the embarrassment of asking for it. > > I'm willing to risk embarrassment by asking for consensus. > > Do we have a consensus that Rik's posts lately haven't been making much > sense? > > If you disagree, please reply to this message with this message in the > body: "Rik's recent posts make complete sense to me". I will accept > any embarrassment rightfully due to me. > > If you agree that Rik's recent posts haven't made much sense, then you > can implicitly agree by not replying to this message. Agreed? > > Hard to embarrass, > Carl. -- Regards, Robert -------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Fisher (aka - Rob, Bob, Robbie, Robbo, Fish) FishNet Computer Services www.fisher.net.nz Phone: 03 383 5807 Mobile: 027 477 3356
