On Sat, 05 May 2007 14:14:54 +1200 dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 03 May 2007 11:18 pm, Nick Rout wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2007 9:29 pm, Andrew Errington wrote: > > > The only solution is to complain to MetroInfo, and keep doing so until it > > > is fixed. Oh, and you could complain to The Press, so that they can > > > investigate the shocking waste of public money. > > > > > > A > > > > Excellent, I actually know a reporter who uses the bus.... > > then can we as a group agree that SVG is a good choice (being open standards > based) but using a proritory engine is bad? > And perhaps agreed then we as individuals (remeber there is no CLUG <wink>) > who are concerned contact Ecan and CCC folk responsible with a sample > (something that does work via a number of different web browsers). > > With said sample it can be shown that a solution using SVG and another engine > other than Adobe can work on a wider set of browsers and OSes than Windows > and MS browsers. > > This can then be submitted to the developers and they can grumble and squirm > about having to rewrite their code. > > dave.
As I am currently working with the network guy who reads all the ticket machines... I'll have a word (:
