Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Hybrid. Coax to big green box (not the smaller green boxes outside
your houses) then fibre from there.

Data and TV are imposed on to coax in the big plastic box that sits next to the bit 19" rack cabinets.

Everything is sent from town on fibre. The telephone is put on UTP in the 19" cabinet box.

Each of those cables, running from the Green box on the road, has 2 pair of UTP (which is currently carrying the POTS phone service).

The coax is a shared resource within the node in your street. This means that it's great value if you're the only one on it or everyone on it only uses it for light browsing and email.

If you get a node with a bunch of heavy users then it can quickly turn to custard on you. However, all that has to be done to fix the problem is break the node in two and put a new fibre feed in to it.

The benefit of DSL is that you can arrogate alot more data into an area close to the dslam than you can with cable. 10 pairs going to 10 houses can deliver up to 240mbits of capacity (assuming a short run on ADSL2+). You would only get 10mbits shared to those same 10 homes with the current cable configuration.

The interesting things about the Telstra Clear network are:

aa. All the cables have been put in conduit. This means that it's not going to be very hard to blow fibre through to every home later on if desired.

bb. The cable running from the street in to your home has 2 UTP pairs. This means that running 500mbit in to each home over ethernet won't be hard to do.

cc. Housings have been put in place outside every other home on the underground network. This means that they have a place to put passive repeaters for fibre without having to do any further work.

dd. The way the coax is set up means that it could be used to supply power to new equipment installed in the green boxes.

ee. The way the UTP is set up also means that you could use it to deliver power to equipment housed in the little green boxes.

Bottom line, some very smart thinking and planning went in to the $100mil that was spent. I personally suspect that somethings just weren't said when the planning was done.

If I was a Telecom share holder I would be concerned about Wellington and Christchurch.

Telecom will still be digging while Telstra are blowing fibre in to homes.

The cost to Telstra to deliver fibre will make it uneconomic for Telecom to compete with.

Cheers Don

Reply via email to