My potentially groundless assumption is that because the motherboard is
new, that the battery is good.  My only option would be to replace as I
couldn't test.

The problem machine kernel is:
jupiter:/home/roger # uname -r
2.6.18.8-0.5-default

This machine I am replying with, also 64bit SuSE, shows
2.6.18.2-34-default.  In Yast Software Management for both, it reports
that the kernel-default installed version and available version are the
same - which doesn't make much sense! And  little confusing. 

So as a first step, a kernel update would seem to be in order, but how,
given Yast doesn't report a more recent version?  And what is considered
"recent"? And why is this one (these ones) so out of date?  Any answers
to these very welcome while I attempt further investigations...


Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> This is a well known problem.
> A Google search "clock drift linux nvidia" yields much info.
> Have you checked the state of the battery which powers the crystal
> clock and  CMOS?
> btw what kernel version are you running?
>
> On 9/17/07, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I should have said, 10.2.1.1 is the IPCop box.  Also, there had been one
>> or more ntp restarts on the 11th and 12th.  Strange that there are no
>> log entries over the weekend, uptime is 18 days.
>>
>> Roger Searle wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi, I have a SuSE 64bit install on an Asus M2N motherboard, and I recall
>>> others having (unresolvable?) time drift issues with a 64bit
>>> installation. Perhaps the common factor was nvidia chipsets, but I could
>>> be making that up.  It is losing something like an hour a day.
>>>
>>> ntpd is running and getting time from an IPCop box.  Yet the time
>>> reported by that box according to the "date" command continues to
>>> drift.  Running "service ntp restart" brings it back in line, so a
>>> solution to keep the box's time in sync might be to put this in a cron
>>> job and run every 15 minutes.  Interestingly after the ntp restart at
>>> 9am this morning (had lost around 3 hours over the weekend), the time is
>>> accurate within a second 3 hours later, which doesn't help me understand
>>> what's happening.
>>>
>>> I could be missing something obvious, so would be interested in any
>>> suggestions from anyone about resolving this?  Here is the last few days
>>> from /var/log/ntp:
>>>
>>> 11 Sep 09:04:10 ntpd[9766]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 09:04:10 ntpd[9766]: kernel time sync disabled 0001
>>> 11 Sep 09:38:25 ntpd[9766]: no servers reachable
>>> 11 Sep 09:43:49 ntpd[9766]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 09:48:11 ntpd[9766]: time reset +6.475822 s
>>> 11 Sep 09:51:37 ntpd[9766]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 11:20:47 ntpd[9766]: no servers reachable
>>> 11 Sep 11:55:08 ntpd[9766]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 12:00:29 ntpd[9766]: time reset +64.498256 s
>>> 11 Sep 12:04:07 ntpd[9766]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 12:48:27 ntpd[9766]: time reset -0.132544 s
>>> 11 Sep 12:52:39 ntpd[9766]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 16:23:28 ntpd[9766]: ntpd exiting on signal 15
>>> 11 Sep 16:27:46 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 16:27:46 ntpd[11380]: time reset -0.224694 s
>>> 11 Sep 16:27:46 ntpd[11380]: kernel time sync enabled 0001
>>> 11 Sep 16:32:10 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 17:26:48 ntpd[11380]: no servers reachable
>>> 11 Sep 17:31:08 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 17:36:37 ntpd[11380]: time reset +73.901648 s
>>> 11 Sep 17:40:38 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 19:34:09 ntpd[11380]: no servers reachable
>>> 11 Sep 19:59:49 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 20:17:02 ntpd[11380]: time reset +7.640369 s
>>> 11 Sep 20:20:29 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 11 Sep 21:03:23 ntpd[11380]: time reset +0.165117 s
>>> 11 Sep 21:07:21 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 12 Sep 01:29:42 ntpd[11380]: time reset +648.102905 s
>>> 12 Sep 01:33:29 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 12 Sep 02:19:46 ntpd[11380]: no servers reachable
>>> 12 Sep 02:36:56 ntpd[11380]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 12 Sep 02:36:56 ntpd[11380]: time correction of 1156 seconds exceeds
>>> sanity limit (1000); set clock manually to the correct UTC time.
>>> 14 Sep 17:10:43 ntpd[31392]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 14 Sep 17:10:43 ntpd[31392]: kernel time sync disabled 0001
>>> 14 Sep 18:42:00 ntpd[31392]: no servers reachable
>>> 14 Sep 18:52:38 ntpd[31392]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 14 Sep 19:10:17 ntpd[31392]: time reset +28.615506 s
>>> 14 Sep 19:13:52 ntpd[31392]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 14 Sep 21:18:07 ntpd[31392]: time reset -0.147810 s
>>> 14 Sep 21:21:39 ntpd[31392]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 14 Sep 23:48:07 ntpd[31392]: no servers reachable
>>> 14 Sep 23:56:39 ntpd[31392]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 14 Sep 23:56:39 ntpd[31392]: time correction of 1234 seconds exceeds
>>> sanity limit (1000); set clock manually to the correct UTC time.
>>> 17 Sep 09:00:43 ntpd[7407]: synchronized to 10.2.1.1, stratum 11
>>> 17 Sep 09:00:43 ntpd[7407]: kernel time sync disabled 0001
>>> 17 Sep 11:26:34 ntpd[7407]: no servers reachable
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>   

Reply via email to