That's the sort of idea I was trying to get at. However I would suggest that it needs to be submitted by someone who does have unimpeachable credibility. If such a demigod exists.
I do know, of all the clients I have suggested move to Linux, not one has gone back to Windows. On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:30 +1300, stringer wrote: > And proving his point about Linux people always having a 'pat' answer to > everything? > > Maybe better NOT to knock him, but to offer them a pre-written article on > the advantages of Open Source software (including pictures etc) which does > not knock the opposition (MS) but simply states the obvious - theres a free > solution for most things, which are sometimes inferior, often as good, and > sometimes better than the paid 'alternative'. :-) > > > At 15:18 11/12/07 +1300, you wrote: > >Not so sure that ignoring it completely is tha best answer, > > > >what about someone with "kudos" contacting the press with a rebutle? > >Chris T > > > > > >On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:06 +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > > On Dec 11, 2007 12:39 PM, Michael Fincham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4319987a11275.html > > > > > > > > What do we make of this one? ;) > > > > > > There is a talk-back or have your say button. > > > > > > I thought it was a load of semi-literate, racist, uninformed, > > > flushable, rubbish. > > > It's probably best to ignore it completely. > > > > > D J H STRINGER > Barrister > > For all your legal work; > > P O Box 1386 > CHRISTCHURCH > NEW ZEALAND > > Phone 64 - 3 - 366 1152 > FAX 64 - 3 - 366 1151
