Hi

I get the idea that being constructive and not worrying about this gentleman's reporting is the preferred approach. I was happier writing about the software than whining about his piece anyway. If I cut the whines out and restructure to add a bit more meat, is anyone willing to help give it a go. Even if it doesn't get published in any paper, it could go on the web or get printed as posters the for the archive. In fact, we are open source, why not release it under BSD type documentation license for all to use (i.e. any paper).

That is a bigger piece of work and I need a structure:

how about
- Software for Free - What is Open Source
- Kids Software for Free
- Home Software for Free
- Office Software for Free
- Multimedia Software for Free
- Operating Systems for Free

Two to three pages on each, this time with some screenshots. Reuse some of the material. Cover 5-7 applications in each group. Pick applications that are Open Source but that have a Windows port.

Regards

Graeme Kiyoto-Ward

Roy Britten wrote:
On 13/12/2007, Chris Hellyar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A better option IMHO might be to offer to write an article (or short
series) of articles on FOSS for the paper.

That's possibly the most sensible thing that's been said on the subject so far.

If only I had more time...

Roy.

Reply via email to