Arrrrrrrrr. Clear as mud. :-). I knew about the 'ThereIsNoCLUG', but didn't understand that the hosting was the limiting factor in the wiki, I thought someone was being overly zealous about the 'perfection' of the solution for it.
Hmmmmmmmmm. Again, tell me to bugger off if I'm out of line... Can I offer virtual LAMP box and a dedicated fixed IP in our DMZ at work to the clug to host a more current wiki engine? I'll be putting another vmware host in the DMZ after Xmas which would have more than enough spare capacity to host wikimedia or similar. Someone else would have to admin it once it's running though. Resources I've got lots of, it's time I'm short of! Cheers, Chris H. On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 11:21 +1300, Jim Cheetham wrote: > > online in the mere twinkling of an eye. Lets face it, we're geeks > > aren't we? > > There is no "we", which may be the source of your misunderstanding :-) > > There is an "I", as in "I am donating some spare cycles from one of my > servers", in a similar manner to the availability of "horse". The > number of spare cycles I have in both terms of CPU/memory/disk and > time are not unlimited ... > > If CLUG wanted to set something else up, then CLUG might have to > exist. http://clug.net.nz/index.php/ThereIsNoCLUG
