Is there a point to this message? It seems to have been posted
already. But it is so porly quoted its hard to tell.

N

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I'll take the flack for this, instead of Don.
>
> In the interests of complete documentation, from which Jim has extracted..
>
> Regards, Rik
>

Reply via email to