Nick Rout wrote:
I realise your post is slightly tongue in cheek, but... Although you are
right about the point of free software, free software is closely (one
might almost say necessarily) tied to open standards. Thats why your
request to the evolution authors to support an out of standard "feature"
met with failure.
Steve commented about the spec being finished.
We should be going back to the RFC and saying that ; should be included.
It's a logical upgrade. Popular and used else where.
Perhaps there's reason why ; shouldn't be used.
I don't know what those reasons are.
I guess my point is about learning 'how' to get things done.
Cheers Don
