Apologies Nick
I have turned off the firewall whilst I try to get things working

ufw -disable
regards Chris t
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 09:57 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> you would need a dns address if you wanted to access any other machine
> by name as opposed to ip address. if you are happy accessing via ip
> address it is not needed.
> 
> do bear in mind some protocols do a dns lookup to see if the
> connecting machine is who it says it is (a reverse dns lookup) and if
> there is no dns available this can produce a long timeout delay.
> 
> do you have a firewall on?
> 
> what does traceroute tell you?
> 
> are all machines on the same subnet (ie 192.168.n.x where n is a
> constant throughout your network and x varies per machine between 1
> and 254.
> 
> what does the routing table say? route -n is the command you want.
> 
> (all this is why dhcp is often a useful protocol!)
> 
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:47 AM, chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A further question please.
> > s there is no server involved, why would I need a DNS address, and where
> > would I get one?
> > Regards Chris T
> > On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 09:06 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> >> no difference between a router and a switch from this point of view.
> >>
> >> left click the network manager icon on the top panel
> >>
> >> click "manual configuration"
> >>
> >> "unlock" and fill in credentials
> >>
> >> click on the connection you want to fiddle with, click properties and
> >> unclick "roaming mode"
> >>
> >> fill in the gaps.
> >>
> >> you'll also need to provide dns addresses in the obvious places
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:54 PM, chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Can anyone direct me to some information that can help me set up a LAN,
> >> > using static ip numbers with a switch, not a router?
> >> >
> >> > there is a heap of information using DHCP, and using routers, but I have
> >> > not been able to find anything using static numbers and a switch.
> >> >
> >> > this particular distro does not seem to like static ip numbers
> >> > Regards Chris T
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to