On 16/01/2009, at 5:17 PM, Jim Cheetham wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Craig Falconer
<[email protected]> wrote:
Script some kind of bulk wget, feed the image to an OCR program,
store the
output in a database and write a web frontend to search it.
Then you can never share this, because it would be redistribution of
copyright material :-\
Mmm ... given that the originals are *pictures*, would a textual
representation of the words represent a *copy* ?
Maybe not a copy, but "derivative work"? ;-)
I bet they use a very restrictive license. Can I be bothered reading
it? /me *shrughs*
--
Delio
Obviously showing the image as a search result would be showing a
copy; but you could provide a link to a public archive instead ... or
just transclude it on the page.
-jim
