The setup was very good. I only had to adjust the monitor a bit using xvidtune. I think caldera is aimed more toward the serious user. I tend more toward hobby use and programming for enjoyment (of all things).
Seems a little sparse to me, but I've been using libranet and elx, which have even the kitchen sink included. Libranet is loaded with window managers. Kde only in 3.1.1? No mozilla/galeon (a must have for me) and Netscape 4.77 (I guess that's stable but I prefer v6). Elx is very up to date. I guess it's beta but it works ok for a home desktop, although it install about 3 megs on the full install, whereas caldera is down about 2, I think. On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:42:35 -0600 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been running the workstation for a couple of weeks. Works > great. No surprises. No earth-shattering improvements either. The > newer versions of XFree and KDE cleared up some problems I had with > those in 3.1. > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > Anyone using Caldera 3.1.1 care to comment on gotcha's or general > > impressions? I just downloaded and will soon install. > > -- > Michael R. Hipp > Microsoft Windows XP: Just say no. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list - > http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the > above URL. > -- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove _NO_SPAM_)! _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
