On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, toylet wrote: > I have already tried both all 3 keys: rsa1, rsa and dsa. > > For protocol version 2: > > id_rsa.pub as authorized_keys in ~/.ssh > id_rsa in putty. > Gave me a "No supported authenication" in /var/log/secure. > > id_dsa.pub as authorized_keys in ~/.ssh > id_dsa in putty. > openssh didn't even give me a prompt for login id. > > For protocol version 1: > > identity.pub as authorized_keys in ~/.ssh > identity in putty. > they are working fine. > > Why all these hussles? > > I can never be a paranoid in security, just wanna know whtehr putty was > supposed to support all version 2 (protocol and authenication) of > openssh 3.x.x. If it does support, I would like to see some evidences. :) > > I am using putty 0.52. > > >>identity is for version 1, right? did I mis-interpret the doc? > >>Or that the key generation has nothing to do with protocol version? > >>when I used identity, I also set my putty to use version 1 protocol. > > Hmm. The latest version I have (3.0.2) uses authorized_keys2. I have no > > clue what putty uses. > > It's possible DSA is not supported on Windoze.
My apoligies if I'v missed something in previous utterances of this thread. I just tried putty to an instance of OpenSSH_3.1p1 sshd without hiccups. Putty inherently doesn't use keys. For this pagent's use is required also. Does password authentication work? _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
