On Tuesday 30 April 2002 08:48 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > Scribbling feverishly on April 30, edj managed to emit: > > On install attempt of libxslt 1.0.16, it failed because libxml had to be > > > > >= 2.4.17. I had libxml 2.4.1. So, I installed libxml2-2.4.20. Still, > > > > libxslt stopped with the same error - it still finds libxml 2.4.1. I > > have the following on my system (WS 3.1): > > Well, libxml2 is not the same thing as libxml, which is the problem. > So, just taking a wild guess, I would install a version of *libxml* >= > 2.4.17, not *libxml2* >= 2.4.17. >
Yeah, I was gonna tell him that... But it doesn't look like libxml >= 2.4.17 exists, at least not according to ftp://xmlsoft.org/ The highest libxml version it shows is 1.8.17. libxml2 has version numbers starting at 2.x.x, and the most current version of libxml2 is 2.4.21 Tim -- Caldera eWorkstation 3.1, kernel 2.4.18, KDE 3.0 from source, Xfree86 4.1.0 8:00pm up 22:51, 3 users, load average: 0.25, 0.21, 0.19 It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
