On Thu, 30 May 2002 05:43:46 -0400 dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > begin Keith Antoine's quote: > > | AFAIK it is built on eD2.4 and it is supposedly the release that > | 3.0 + should have been but was not. In upgrades and also the ease > | of installation plus the availabilty of upgrade rpms etc. > > it's going to be *very* interesting this morning to hear what the > caldera-turbo-suse-conectiva plan is. if the story is as it has been > presented so far, it could well turn into the uberdistribution that > we've sought and then simply be a matter of whose administration > tools are least overbearing and objectionable (my chief complaint > with suse). this presupposes that they announce the right stuff and > further presupposes that they pull it off, but i awakened this > morning more optimistic about the future of distributional linux than > i have been in a couple of years.
Still optimistic, dep? I, for one, am glad *that's* over. Nothing like having my hope clubbed to death like a baby seal to start my day off right. I should have known better. Once again, Caldera has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Fscking amazing. > the opening exists for them now to do it right. fingers crossed, > everybody. That's the last time I cross *my* fingers. Kurt -- Your lucky number has been disconnected. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
