On Thu, 30 May 2002 22:04:18 -0400 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2002 05:43:46 -0400 > dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > begin Keith Antoine's quote: > > > > | AFAIK it is built on eD2.4 and it is supposedly the release that > > | 3.0 + should have been but was not. In upgrades and also the > > | ease of installation plus the availabilty of upgrade rpms etc. > > > > it's going to be *very* interesting this morning to hear what the > > caldera-turbo-suse-conectiva plan is. if the story is as it has > > been presented so far, it could well turn into the > > uberdistribution that we've sought and then simply be a matter of > > whose administration tools are least overbearing and objectionable > > (my chief complaint with suse). this presupposes that they > > announce the right stuff and further presupposes that they pull it > > off, but i awakened this morning more optimistic about the future > > of distributional linux than i have been in a couple of years. > > Still optimistic, dep? I, for one, am glad *that's* over. Nothing > like having my hope clubbed to death like a baby seal to start my > day off right. I should have known better. Once again, Caldera has > snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Fscking amazing. > > > the opening exists for them now to do it right. fingers crossed, > > everybody. > > That's the last time I cross *my* fingers. >
We know about Caldera (Corporate Logo should be a toilet bowl all aflush). The other players seem to have some business smarts, so why are they aligning themselves with an unlucky player? -- Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD? gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
