Ok, perhaps. But how hard is it to say "pick one, any one, and go with it". It's a Jihad because people make it so, not because of some compelling technical reason. Let's just settle it by making a new directory called /jihad and put everything there. Arguing "tastes great" "less filling" gets us nowhere.
Or am I missing something? Michael On Friday 21 June 2002 09:26 am, dep wrote: > begin Michael Hipp's quote: > | It would help greatly, if a distro has kde for example, they would > | install it the same as everyone else. > | > | If there's an argument against that, beyond the /usr vs /opt Jihad > | and other silliness, I'd sure like to hear it. > > well, but see, you've in two sentences a.) made a perfectly sensible > proposal, and b.) pronounced it a silly jihad. because until there is > agreement on the items noted in the second sentence, the proposal you > make in the first sentence will not be possible. and as long as it's > characterized as a silly jihad as opposed to a serious issue, it's > not likely to be resolved. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
