You may think, but there are certainly those who "am" and don't. We are by default are like sheep. It takes concerted effort to turn that gray-matter into a thinking machine, and unfortunately there are not many in this age which will do so.
The Scientific-Method is an important guideline, but through logical analysis is reduced to "a good method to approach learning", not the answers to all questions. To think otherwise would be ludicrous since it one would have to then assume that all that can be known is observable in a measureable fashion. The very existence of a Living God, who chose NOT to be manipulated would disruptall attempts at measurement for may things. This is why there are still "Wonders Of The World". While we attempt to sweep any religeous possibilities under the carpet, we end up doing a great deal of damage to the world, both for those who do not believe in a supreme being as well as those who do. On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:14:58 -0400 "Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think. Therefore I am! - famous French philosopher, devisor of > analytical geometry, and developer of the scientific method. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
