On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Terence McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:44:38 -0400 (EDT) > Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Redhat. Even if just 1 distro doesn't folllow the rule, that > > automatically means its not law. > > > > No- surely it just means one has broken the law? A criminal breaking the law doesn't >mean it's not the law. > > But are we talking about a strict rule or law?
I'm not at all sure what you're talking about here. I'm talking about Linux, you're talking about criminal law. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
