> Huh, and all these years I didn't know I couldn't do that. I grant you > the cut part, but copy/paste have been working fine. My fear is that the > distribution gods will leave xterm behind in favour of some bloated > critter like multi-gnome-terminal. > > I loaded Red Hat's beta, limbo, on a K6-II 400mHz system with 256mb ram. > Doing a simple listing such as "ls -l /usr/lib" was strikingly different > in speed. Gnome-term was painfully slow to watch compared to xterm which > seemed to zip right thru the listing.
Keith I understand what you say. A lot of so called developers really do not understand proper code design. There are many reasons for this and my rant would be long<g>. I beleive you can build into a program many bell switches & whistles, but you need to balance them with functionality and proper code design, techniqics. Most do not know how to save clock cycles, some very basic stuff. I do stand corected about copy/paste. I would like to see a new window selected by request. But it is fast. -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1 Registered Linux User .~. / v \ /( _ )\ ^ ^ In Linux we trust! _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
