On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:57:15 -0400 Marvin Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For Intel, Itanium's failure would be a painful black eye, a > setback in its heavily financed assault on the corporate > computing world beyond the personal computer. > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/29/technology/circuits/29CHIP.html?ex=1034318935&ei=1&en=1c38e33c1780ab04 > The best part was the last bit... "The common view is, `If it doesn't save us money we have no interest in it,' " Mr. Shulman said. "It's a very hard-nosed view." And what in sam-hill was on their minds to codename their 64bit alternative project YAMHILL? -- ****************************************************************************** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net 2:06pm up 200 days, 19:15, 6 users, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.02 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
