n 10/18/02 11:26, Collins wrote:
Indeed. And we won't even get into performance issues. I think its just a tad hypocritical of someone to be preaching on how old technology is better & more reliable while installing RH8.On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:18:26 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom) wrote:>Net Llama! wrote: > >No data of value on drive, and I find using ancient technology >okay if it works, and the most flexable/reliable because it's >old, and well known. > Enjoy your outage when it comes, and it will come. Ext2 is not that flexable, and it can be relied on to eat your data.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
5:20pm up 6 days, 5:39, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.18, 0.30
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
